identity

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 396 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Bug: Search Page doesn't pull in Title (h1) #528908

    identity
    Lifetime Member
    Post count: 445
    This reply has been marked as private.
    in reply to: Bug: Search Page doesn't pull in Title (h1) #528736

    identity
    Lifetime Member
    Post count: 445
    This reply has been marked as private.
    in reply to: Bug: Search Page doesn't pull in Title (h1) #528540

    identity
    Lifetime Member
    Post count: 445

    One other thing I just noticed though is that if you select one of the suggested locations (e.g., In: Some City) the h1/title on the search page includes the search term, but not the location. The results are filtered by that location though.

    If you type in a specific address location, rather than selecting one of the suggested cities, that location is included in the h1/title (based on my programmatic pattern at least).

    Explore %%search_term%% %%search_near%%

    Don’t know if that is specifically a bug or just a quirk 😉

    Cheers

    in reply to: Bug: Search Page doesn't pull in Title (h1) #528538

    identity
    Lifetime Member
    Post count: 445

    Excellent, thanks!

    Cheers

    in reply to: Bug: Search Page doesn't pull in Title (h1) #528237

    identity
    Lifetime Member
    Post count: 445
    This reply has been marked as private.
    in reply to: GD "Templates" Returned in WP search results #526629

    identity
    Lifetime Member
    Post count: 445

    Excellent! Thanks, I’ll check this out.

    Sadly, this seems like another “basic” thing that should just be built into WP to begin with.

    Cheers

    in reply to: Clear Location #526158

    identity
    Lifetime Member
    Post count: 445

    Stiofan,

    Always a pleasure. Super impressed with the changes over the years and exciting to dive back in and resurrect my project!

    And as always, appreciate your time and further detail. I totally understand everything is a balancing act, and speed as we know has become critically important for many reasons.

    All in all, I do like the way a lot of this is handled and what is most critical is that someone backing out of a listing doesn’t have location changed and the result set doesn’t change on them. I’m sure I can play around a little more with the configuration and setup to get something I’m happy with.

    I like that you are using TripAdvisor as a bit of a benchmark as I think they’ve done an amazing job and probably the gold standard above Yelp, AirBnB, etc.

    Thanks for pointing out the location icon… I’d really like to request/recommend that instead of that, a more prominent indicator for clearing could be made, perhaps with the clearing indicator to the right of the location name (https://fontawesome.com/icons/times-circle?style=regular), perhaps like this:

    !Chicago x

    One thing I think TA does that also helps with this is the breadcrumbs and forcing the user to select a location even upon entering into any of the categories.

    I know Yoast or other 3rd party tools can be used for breadcrumbs to duplicate that, and the “location force” is also mixed…for a large site like TA, totally makes sense, maybe not so much on a hyper-local.

    Thanks as always for listening. I know you take the feedback and recommendations into consideration and work them in when possible.

    Cheers

    in reply to: Prevent Listing Deletions #526043

    identity
    Lifetime Member
    Post count: 445

    Excellent, thanks!

    Cheers

    in reply to: Clear Location #526013

    identity
    Lifetime Member
    Post count: 445

    Alex,

    Right, understand. Not to harp on it, but I think this is a key UX area, so please indulge…

    My view is that this is a passive interaction at best, and one which the user may not even be aware of. In either case, I think the main issue here is specifically the passive nature of this.

    For a large geo area, maybe this isn’t such an issue….one could assume that if I click on a listing for restaurants in California that I then want to see listings in California only. But for hyper-local sites where various cities might be contained within “reasonable consideration” distance, this could be very impactful.

    In both cases of archive links (both Archive URLs and Archive URLs on Details Page; see *Note below) set or disabled, as a user, things happen that I may not specifically be expecting, wanting, or again, even be aware of.

    Examples (4 primary use cases):

    Archive links enabled, user not changing location:
    – Click Restaurants (All locations)
    – Click a listing (Location passively changed to Seattle)
    – Click Fine Dining category link/icon from listing (Seattle)
    – Go to Fine Dining category and view listings only for Seattle
    {would consider this an unexpected user experience…we assume the user wanted to limit listings by Seattle}
    – Click to homepage or non-GD page (Location passively changed to All locations)
    – Click into Bars category (All locations)
    – Click into a listing (Location passively changed to Redmond)
    = Location changes are being made on the behalf of the user, which they may or may not expect, want, or even be aware of).

    Archive links enabled, user actively changing location:
    – Click Restaurants (All locations)
    – Selects Seattle
    – Redirects to Seattle location page
    – Clicks Restaurants again (Seattle)
    – Click a listing (Seattle)
    – Click Fine Dining category link/icon from listing (Seattle)
    – Go to Fine Dining category and view listings only for Seattle
    {would consider this an expected user experience…user wanted to limit listings by Seattle}
    – Click to homepage or non-GD page (Location passively changed to All locations)
    – Click into Bars category (All locations)
    – Click into a listing (Location passively changed to Redmond)
    {unknown expectations…user may expect or understand location reset, or may have expected to still be limited to Seattle}
    = Location changes are being made on the behalf of the user, which they may or may not expect, want, or even be aware of).

    Archive links set to disable, user not changing location:
    – Click Restaurants (All locations)
    – Click a listing (All locations)
    – Click Fine Dining category link/icon from listing (All locations)
    – Go to Fine Dining category and view listings for all locations
    {would consider this an expected user experience…user has not actively limited location nor has it been changed}
    – Click to homepage or non-GD page (All locations)
    – Click into Bars category (All locations)
    – Click into a listing (All locations)
    = Location changes are not being made on the behalf of the user, which is what they would most likely expect).

    Archive links disabled, user actively changing location:
    – Click Restaurants (All locations)
    – Selects Seattle
    – Redirects to Seattle location page
    – Clicks Restaurants again (All locations)
    – Click a listing (All locations)
    – Click Fine Dining category link/icon from listing (All locations)
    – Go to Fine Dining category and view listings for All locations
    {would consider this an unexpected user experience…user wanted to limit listings by Seattle, which became reset}
    – Click to homepage or non-GD page (All locations)
    – Click into Bars category (All locations)
    – Click into a listing (All locations)
    {unknown expectations…user may expect or understand location reset, or may have expected to be limited to Seattle}
    = Location changes are being made on the behalf of the user, which they may or may not expect, want, or even be aware of).
    * Note: this example does change a little bit if Archive URLs are enabled, but Detail page disabled; but a passive change again happens clicking to Fine Dining from the listing.

    In all examples, there are passive changes being made, perhaps with lesser extent on the Archive URLs enabled and only Detail Page disabled, but still points where potentially unexpected changes are being made.

    I think users can understand that navigating away from the directory pages (ie to homepage or non-directory page) could/would/might reset location. What I think most users would consider unexpected is location being changed passively “on their behalf” in the various examples above.

    I don’t know of any other sites that operate in this way.

    Cheers

    in reply to: Clear Location #525851

    identity
    Lifetime Member
    Post count: 445

    Thanks Alex. I’ve played around with the setting now and have a better understanding.

    I have to disagree on “…make location browsing easier” here. In specific because it is not a sitewide persistent state, and because location is modified without users’ specific interaction. If it was, which I think is how users would expect it to behave, then I might agree. But it isn’t sitewide and persistent, based on a user navigating off of GD….the problem of course is that GD vs non-GD is irrelevant and unknown to the user.

    So this presents the issue of unexpected behavior when suddenly they are no longer filtered by the location that they selected after navigating “off GD.”

    I think even greater than GD vs. non-GD is the fact that Location gets set, or unset, without direct user interaction. They may not even be aware or notice that it is being set or unset.

    The fact that they can clear it by removing it from the “Near” search box, assuming they notice it and are still interacting with the search box, is good at least. I’m especially glad to see that if a user views a listing and then “backs” out to the grid/archive, that location remains unset and the grid results aren’t adjusted.

    But even my own experience navigating the site, with both the Archive URLs setting as “Add City” as well as “Disable” proved confusing, both in the instances where I selected a Location, only to have it be unselected as I navigated and where it was selected because of my navigation.

    Having the user experience being altered without the a users specific interaction, in this instance and I think most instances beyond GD, is not good…it becomes unpredictable and often unexpected, and possibly in this case, unknown…yet frustrating when they can’t find something they think should be there because the results are now altered/filtered by location but they haven’t realized it.

    I know this is a challenging topic and everyone has differing opinions and desires on how these things should function. I hold the belief that this is not an optimal user experience due to the reasons above. I won’t assume that it is “easy,” as I remember lots of discussions around Location back in the day with V1, but it would be nice if, somehow, the 1) handling of location selection (I’ll call it “active vs. passive user input”) could be admin configurable at least, and in either case I think, 2) location setting could be made persistent sitewide (via cookie or something at least, even if the “Location” designation changes on non-GD pages, but reverts to selected location upon returning to a GD page).

    Thanks again.

    in reply to: Clear Location #525843

    identity
    Lifetime Member
    Post count: 445

    Thanks Alex,

    It would be nice if a “clear” or “everywhere” (like in V1) option could be added to the Location Changer for usability.

    Can you detail the affect of the “adding location” as you mentioned above. I know the option and had it set to City, but now I’m not entirely sure I understand the impact and function of that option.

    Thanks!

    in reply to: Prevent Listing Deletions #525831

    identity
    Lifetime Member
    Post count: 445

    Thanks.

    I do have it set to move to trash. And I do see how the Author Actions widget has a “Hide Delete” selection. As far as I know, other than the Profile page created by UsersWP, a delete option doesn’t show up anywhere else.

    On one hand then, perhaps this is a request I need to make over on UsersWP that a similar “Hide Delete” option be made, but I also view it as an overarching GD request that a setting within the GD General settings, like the Hide Delete be made to prevent the option globally so that UsersWP or any other addon not allow deletion.

    Perhaps the latter isn’t even possible and it is only due to the GD/Parent company relation that enables that in the first place.

    Thanks

    in reply to: Make Field Icons appear next to Frontend Search Field #525574

    identity
    Lifetime Member
    Post count: 445

    Thanks Naveen.

    Understand and hopefully it can be added sometime down the road as I’m sure it would prove beneficial to the UX.

    Cheers

    in reply to: Unable to Upgrade PHP Beyond 5.6!! #524521

    identity
    Lifetime Member
    Post count: 445

    Kiran,

    I don’t know that anything isn’t working as expected. I’m assuming that the function may have been deprecated but may still be operating as it should…just that it is recommended not to and at some point may no longer function.

    I don’t know specifically though…was just passing on the information.

    Cheers

    in reply to: Unable to Upgrade PHP Beyond 5.6!! #522619

    identity
    Lifetime Member
    Post count: 445

    FYI,

    I was able to get PHP Compatibility Checker running now as well and nearly all plugins were marked as okay with 7.3 (main GD, GD Google Analytics, Invoicing, and Ninja Forms timed out unfortunately).

    GD Event Manager did come back with these errors though:

    geodir_event_manager/includes/class-geodir-event-api.php
    ————————————————————————————————————————
    FOUND 2 ERRORS AFFECTING 2 LINES
    ————————————————————————————————————————
    283 | ERROR | Extension ‘mysql_’ is deprecated since PHP 5.5 and removed since PHP 7.0; Use mysqli instead
    292 | ERROR | Extension ‘mysql_’ is deprecated since PHP 5.5 and removed since PHP 7.0; Use mysqli instead
    ————————————————————————————————————————

    Cheers

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 396 total)
20% Discount Offer
Hurry! Get your 20% discount before it expires. Get 20% Discount