Location Pages and SEO elements
This topic contains 8 replies, has 4 voices, and was last updated by Stiofan O’Connor 10 years, 1 month ago.
We have moved to a support ticketing system and our forums are now closed.
Open Support Ticket-
AuthorPosts
-
September 8, 2014 at 5:05 pm #14654
I know there are some things being worked on already with regard to SEO elements and some of the pages, but I don’t recall whether this is part of it.
In addition to being able to insert some location text on-page with the city description, need the ability to edit the title tags for these pages. Unfortunately, the Location pages don’t show up within the Yoast plugin either since they aren’t entirely within the post, page, category, and tag system.
Additionally, the canonical element on these pages need to be fixed as the specific location pages all point to the broad level location URL (example.com/location/).
cheers
September 8, 2014 at 5:30 pm #14657Of the title part you can only change the “location” word. The rest of the title at the moment can’t be changed and it will be Location country region city – site title.
You will be able to add unique front-end and meta descriptions for all locations with the next release.
Can you provide more information about the last part? I think I understand the whole concept, but I’m not entirely sure how we should fix this.
To which link should we add the rel=”canonical” element? Only to the default location link?
Let us know,
September 8, 2014 at 9:26 pm #14689Thanks.
Ah, I’m seeing the city information now at least for the titles. Prior to the new release I just had the word “Location” and sitename, without any city details.
As for the canonical link element.
Currently the main location page is being referenced as canonical for all children pages.
So, example.com/location/ canonical is example.com/location/ (Ok)
But,
example.com/location/united-states/illinois/chicago/
example.com/location/united-states/illinois/new-york/Are both canonicalized to example.com/location/
Essentially this is telling search engines that they should crawl and index the main location pages instead of these two pages, greatly diminishing the local geo-signals and possibly even excluding the Chicago and New York pages from the search engines.
Each of these should really canonicalize back to themselves, or safer to remove the canonical element entirely on those pages if that can’t be done.
Also noticed an issue on the CPT-city pages where it references back to the same page minus the trailing “/” as the canonical.
“example/cpt/chicago/” stating canonical is “example/cpt/chicago”
Problem is, that redirects to the example/cpt/chicago/, creating an endless loop.The subcategory version is okay:
“example/cpt/chicago/restaurants/” stating itself as canonical.The everywhere/non-city based versions of the CPT and CPT + category pages are okay.
Hope that helps.
cheers
September 8, 2014 at 9:33 pm #14692Yes that was a bug with Yoast SEO plugin.
Me for this link:
http://wpgeo.directory/location/united-states/illinois/chicago/
I see this in source:
<link rel='canonical' href='http://wpgeo.directory/location/united-states/illinois/chicago' />
Isn’t that correct?
September 9, 2014 at 7:07 pm #14818Almost, notice how your URL has the trailing slash, but the canonical doesn’t:
http://wpgeo.directory/location/united-states/illinois/chicago/
vs
http://wpgeo.directory/location/united-states/illinois/chicagoThat’s technically a different URL, and in this case, try going to that URL and you’ll find WP nicely takes you to the first URL.
But what this does for the search engines is to send them into an infinite loop. Granted, the search engines expected things like that to happen, so they gracefully exit that, but it does send a lower quality signal to them and they begin to ignore that canonical recommendation anyway.
cheers
September 9, 2014 at 7:41 pm #14826Well that should be an easy fix. I’ll ask Stiofan to apply it for next release.
Thx
September 20, 2014 at 6:24 am #15947when we set geodirectory homepage as homepage of the website, we get two webpages displaying the same content. eg.
example.com and example.com/location/ bothe of these two pages output the same result. is it not duplicate content.
is example.com/location/ page is canonical to example.com
sorry to bother if it is already asked in any other thread. kindly share the link of other thread
September 20, 2014 at 5:08 pm #15979Hi,
this is in our to do list already and should be fixed in next version.
Thx
October 4, 2014 at 3:15 pm #17468This is resolved
-
AuthorPosts
We have moved to a support ticketing system and our forums are now closed.
Open Support Ticket