mb

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 131 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Get rid of the paralax header for some pages in Supreme #390711

    mb
    Buyer
    Post count: 151

    Stiofan, the custom field worked perfect. It is easy to start with.

    Giri, I will definately try your code when the need of more customizations is really there.

    Thank you for the help!!!

    Let’s mark the ticket as solved.

    in reply to: Get rid of the paralax header for some pages in Supreme #389818

    mb
    Buyer
    Post count: 151

    Thanks, you are a treasure!

    Looking forward and have a nice weekend

    in reply to: Get rid of the paralax header for some pages in Supreme #389737

    mb
    Buyer
    Post count: 151

    Hi, thanks for the CSS solution proposal but this is not what I meant.

    If I hide some header areas with CSS, but I need to show h1 for SEO or UX, I will have then double H1 for those pages where the header is hidden, but the h1 is printed in the code already in the paralax header.

    Double h1 are problem for SEO.

    I need to completely disable the header code for some pages. I would just need your guidance in which files and where in the code exactly the headers are controlled for Supreme. I will add then my own conditions to allow the paralax header to appear or not on specific pages/posts.

    Looking forward to hearing from you and thanks in advance

    in reply to: BETA TESTERS – Invoicing #339645

    mb
    Buyer
    Post count: 151
    This reply has been marked as private.
    in reply to: BETA TESTERS – Invoicing #339523

    mb
    Buyer
    Post count: 151
    This reply has been marked as private.
    in reply to: VAT inclusion #283840

    mb
    Buyer
    Post count: 151

    Hi Stiofan,

    any updates since the last month?

    Cheers

    in reply to: Social Importer just for some packages #240567

    mb
    Buyer
    Post count: 151

    Thanks, paolo!

    I will submit this as a feature request.

    By the way I submitted another feature request but I don’t see it online.

    Should it be first approved by the support?

    Cheers.

    in reply to: VAT inclusion #237938

    mb
    Buyer
    Post count: 151

    Great products take time to craft!

    Looking forward for the beta and thank you for the huge update in the right direction.

    Proper handling of these features really assures that we can monetize easily in countries like Germany – you cannot imagine how strict the laws are here.

    in reply to: Exclude scpeific custom post type from search dropdown #233202

    mb
    Buyer
    Post count: 151

    Great!
    Many thanks!

    in reply to: Extra images uploaded by visitors #231703

    mb
    Buyer
    Post count: 151

    Thanks for the clarification.

    in reply to: Openstreetmap Geolocate without user confirmaiton #231702

    mb
    Buyer
    Post count: 151

    Hi paolo, thanks for the feedback.

    I also found the Nominatum policies in openstreetmap.

    Cheers.


    mb
    Buyer
    Post count: 151

    Hi paolo,

    pulling locations from the DB is actually a perfect way by my opinion. I just wanted to mention it because it was spoken smth else above in the post.

    I am waiting now the updates with the more realistic ‘near by’ and ‘radius’ search.

    The best solution is to perform a radius search when there is a location chosen from the suggestions, instead of just limiting it to the city.

    Cheers.


    mb
    Buyer
    Post count: 151

    Hi,

    I have a new input.

    Actually at the moment the suggestions are pulled off from the GD database entries. I figured out this because I had couple of locations where I had to merge 2 cities (with very slight differences in long and lat). And the suggestion tool was giving me 2 cities with the same name till I merged them.

    After I merged them it was giving me only 1 suggestion.

    So, it is actually pulling the suggestions from the entries already in the GD database.

    Any comments on this?

    I also commented on another post with a ‘true nearby search’ request. I think at the bottom line, we are referring to simply making this functionality better for the end user and looking for similar results to achieve.

    The best would be always radius search to be applied (no matter a suggestion is used or the city as a word is entered)) and never just ONLY showing the entries in the suggested city. Or at least the admin can choose to switch on and off the radius search.

    in reply to: VAT inclusion #231392

    mb
    Buyer
    Post count: 151

    Waiting for testing…

    in reply to: True "nearby" listings… #231391

    mb
    Buyer
    Post count: 151

    I appreciate this effort and changes from the team too!

    +1 for true radius search.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 131 total)